A child says that a tall, narrow glass has more juice than a short, wide glass even after watching the same juice poured from one container to the other. Which concept best explains the child's error?
- AThe child is showing object permanence by searching for a hidden toy.
- BThe child focuses on one dimension and misses the transformation.correct
- CThe child is using a variable-ratio schedule to maintain behavior.
- DThe child is demonstrating retroactive interference from new learning.
Why B is correct
The child does not yet coordinate height and width to conserve volume.
"A child says that a tall, narrow glass has more juice than a short, wide glass even after watching the same..." details toward cognitive development, not just a familiar Development and Learning label. The credited option, "The child is focusing on one visible dimension and not coordinating the transformation", is supported because The child centers on height and fails to conserve quantity. "The child is demonstrating retroactive interference from new learning" is a real-looking alternative, but No memory interference pattern is described; "The child is showing object permanence by searching for a hidden toy" also fails because Object permanence concerns knowing an object exists when out of sight. The aim is to connect the concrete evidence to the psychological mechanism, then reject choices that shift the process, time frame, or research logic away from the scenario pattern.