After seeing news coverage of a plane crash, a traveler overestimates the danger of flying even though she has read that severe car accidents are more common. Which cognitive shortcut best explains the judgment?
- AConfirmation bias, because she is searching only for evidence supporting a prior belief.
- BThe availability heuristic, because a vivid example is easier to bring to mind.correct
- CFunctional fixedness, because she cannot imagine a new use for an object.
- DAlgorithmic reasoning, because she is following a guaranteed step-by-step rule.
Why B is correct
The traveler relies on mental availability rather than base-rate information.
"After seeing news coverage of a plane crash, a traveler overestimates the danger of flying even though she has..." details toward availability heuristic, not just a familiar Cognition label. The credited option, "The availability heuristic, because a vivid example is easier to bring to mind", is supported because The vivid crash example is mentally available and distorts probability judgment. "Confirmation bias, because she is searching only for evidence supporting a prior..." is a real-looking alternative, but The scenario does not describe selectively searching for supporting evidence; "Functional fixedness, because she cannot imagine a new use for an object" also fails because No object-use problem is involved. The aim is to connect the concrete evidence to the psychological mechanism, then reject choices that shift the process, time frame, or research logic away from the scenario pattern.