Worked examplesThree real ratification of the u.s. constitution questions
From the practice pool, not the mock papers — each with the reasoning that produces the answer.
None of these questions carry a figure — they are decided by reasoning from the stem alone.
76% test a single AP skill: Source Analysis. That makes this topic unusually predictable to prepare for.
Source Analysis
A delegate supports ratification but agrees that explicit protections for speech, religion, and criminal procedure should be added immediately afterward. Which compromise does this reflect?
- AThe Federalist promise to add a Bill of Rights to address Anti-Federalist concerns.correct
- BA direct-democracy solution, because citizens would vote on each national policy rather than ratify a governing framework.
- CA unitary system, because the national government would control state governments as administrative subdivisions.
- DA small-republic argument, because critics would say republican government works best in a limited territory.
Why A is correct
The Federalist promise to add a Bill of Rights to address Anti-Federalist concerns is correct because it best matches the evidence in the stem.
The stem asks students to apply Ratification of the U.S. Constitution. The decisive clue is "A delegate supports ratification but agrees that explicit protections for speech, religion, and criminal procedure should be added immediately afterward. Which compromise does this". The Federalist promise to add a Bill of Rights to address Anti-Federalist concerns fits because it best matches the evidence in the stem. B: A direct-democracy solution points to citizens would vote on each national policy rather than ratify a governing framework; C: A unitary system points to the national government would control state governments as administrative subdivisions; D: A small-republic argument points to critics would say republican government works best in a limited territory.
Source Analysis
An essay argues that a large republic can control factions because many interests will make it harder for one faction to dominate. Which Federalist argument is being used?
- AA unitary system, because the national government would control state governments as administrative subdivisions.
- BA small-republic argument, because critics would say republican government works best in a limited territory.
- CFederalist No. 10's claim that an extended republic can reduce the dangers of faction.correct
- DA direct-democracy solution, because citizens would vote on each national policy rather than ratify a governing framework.
Why C is correct
Federalist No. 10's claim that an extended republic can reduce the dangers of faction is correct because it best matches the evidence in the stem.
The stem asks students to apply Ratification of the U.S. Constitution. The decisive clue is "An essay argues that a large republic can control factions because many interests will make it harder for one faction to dominate. Which Federalist argument is being used?". Federalist No. 10's claim that an extended republic can reduce the dangers of faction fits because it best matches the evidence in the stem. A: A unitary system points to the national government would control state governments as administrative subdivisions; B: A small-republic argument points to critics would say republican government works best in a limited territory; D: A direct-democracy solution points to citizens would vote on each national policy rather than ratify a governing framework.
Source Analysis
A writer warns that a distant national government will be too large for citizens to monitor and will eventually weaken state authority. Which side of the ratification debate does this resemble?
- AA small-republic argument, because critics would say republican government works best in a limited territory.
- BA direct-democracy solution, because citizens would vote on each national policy rather than ratify a governing framework.
- CA unitary system, because the national government would control state governments as administrative subdivisions.
- DThe Anti-Federalist argument that a large republic would endanger liberty and state power.correct
Why D is correct
The Anti-Federalist argument that a large republic would endanger liberty and state power is correct because it best matches the evidence in the stem.
The stem asks students to apply Ratification of the U.S. Constitution. The decisive clue is "A writer warns that a distant national government will be too large for citizens to monitor and will eventually weaken state authority. Which side of the ratification debate does t". The Anti-Federalist argument that a large republic would endanger liberty and state power fits because it best matches the evidence in the stem. A: A small-republic argument points to critics would say republican government works best in a limited territory; B: A direct-democracy solution points to citizens would vote on each national policy rather than ratify a governing framework; C: A unitary system points to the national government would control state governments as administrative subdivisions.
38 questions on this topic, free to start.
Ten a day at no cost. One account covers SAT, ACT and AP.
Start freeLast reviewed 2026-08-28. Topic and unit names follow the
College Board course framework. Question counts describe the PrepScore practice bank, not the exam.