A grassland fire removes aboveground vegetation but leaves soil intact. Plant cover is measured during recovery. Which interpretation is best supported?
- ACommunity recovery after disturbance with soil remaining is secondary successioncorrect
- BThe data show that plant cover becomes genetically identical at all times.
- CPrimary succession is occurring because no soil remains after the fire.
- DSuccession cannot occur after a disturbance.
Why A is correct
Because the fire disturbs the community but leaves soil intact, the changing plant community over time is consistent with secondary succession.
The evidence in the prompt matters before the topic label: "A grassland fire removes aboveground vegetation but leaves soil intact. Plant cover is measured during recovery....". The supported answer is "Secondary succession is occurring because the community changes over time..." because Because the fire disturbs the community but leaves soil intact, the changing plant community over time is consistent with secondary succession. Distractors such as data show that plant cover becomes genetically identical at all times or Primary succession is occurring because no soil remains after the fire either ignore the stated pattern or name a related concept without matching the evidence.