A student cannot recall a classmate's name while standing in the hallway. Later, after seeing the classmate carrying a violin case, the name comes back. Which explanation best fits the change?
- AAn external cue helped access stored information that was not available moments earlier.correct
- BSensory adaptation increased the loudness of the hallway sounds.
- CRetroactive interference made the new name erase every older memory.
- DEgocentrism prevented the student from understanding another person's perspective.
Why A is correct
The crucial event is a cue that improves retrieval.
retrieval cues explains the evidence in "A student cannot recall a classmate's name while standing in the hallway.". The credited option, "An external cue helped access stored information that was not available moments earlier", is supported because The violin case served as a cue that helped retrieve the name. "Sensory adaptation increased the loudness of the hallway sounds" is a real-looking alternative, but Sound adaptation is unrelated to recalling a name; "Retroactive interference made the new name erase every older memory" also fails because Retroactive interference would involve newer learning disrupting older learning, not a helpful cue. The aim is to connect the concrete evidence to the psychological mechanism, then reject choices that shift the process, time frame, or research logic away from the scenario pattern.